· 21 Most Fascinating Dating Studies for 1. Around 47% of Americans Say It’s Harder to Date Now. The rise of online dating has undeniably changed how single 2. Estimated Reading Time: 10 mins · A Solid 28% of Online Daters Make Over $75K a Year. In , the number crunchers at Statistica broke down the income levels of the online dating population to see if The University of Indiana presents this study, which investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants, exploring how participants manage their own online Research Article Summary Online dating sites frequently claim that they have fundamentally altered the dating landscape for the better. This article employs psychological science to ... read more
adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. You can also find the questions asked, and the answers the public provided in this topline. From personal ads that began appearing in publications around the s to videocassette dating services that sprang up decades ago, the platforms people use to seek out romantic partners have evolved throughout history.
This evolution has continued with the rise of online dating sites and mobile apps. Today, three-in-ten U. Previous Pew Research Center studies about online dating indicate that the share of Americans who have used these platforms — as well as the share who have found a spouse or partner through them — has risen over time.
Americans who have used online dating offer a mixed look at their time on these platforms. On a broad level, online dating users are more likely to describe their overall experience using these platforms in positive rather than negative terms.
Additionally, majorities of online daters say it was at least somewhat easy for them to find others that they found physically attractive, shared common interests with, or who seemed like someone they would want to meet in person. But users also share some of the downsides to online dating. Roughly seven-in-ten online daters believe it is very common for those who use these platforms to lie to try to appear more desirable. Other incidents highlight how dating sites or apps can become a venue for bothersome or harassing behavior — especially for women under the age of Online dating has not only disrupted more traditional ways of meeting romantic partners, its rise also comes at a time when norms and behaviors around marriage and cohabitation also are changing as more people delay marriage or choose to remain single.
These shifting realities have sparked a broader debate about the impact of online dating on romantic relationships in America.
Others offer a less flattering narrative about online dating — ranging from concerns about scams or harassment to the belief that these platforms facilitate superficial relationships rather than meaningful ones. This survey finds that the public is somewhat ambivalent about the overall impact of online dating.
adults conducted online Oct. The following are among the major findings. Experience with online dating varies substantially by age. Beyond age, there also are striking differences by sexual orientation.
There are only modest differences between men and women in their use of dating sites or apps, while white, black or Hispanic adults all are equally likely to say they have ever used these platforms. At the same time, a small share of U. adults report that they found a significant other through online dating platforms. This too follows a pattern similar to that seen in overall use, with adults under the age of 50, those who are LGB or who have higher levels of educational attainment more likely to report finding a spouse or committed partner through these platforms.
Online dating users are more likely to describe their overall experience with using dating sites or apps in positive, rather than negative, terms. For the most part, different demographic groups tend to view their online dating experiences similarly. But there are some notable exceptions. While majorities across various demographic groups are more likely to describe their searches as easy, rather than difficult, there are some differences by gender.
There are substantial gender differences in the amount of attention online daters say they received on dating sites or apps. The survey also asked online daters about their experiences with getting messages from people they were interested in. And while gender differences remain, they are far less pronounced. Online daters widely believe that dishonesty is a pervasive issue on these platforms.
By contrast, online daters are less likely to think harassment or bullying, and privacy violations, such as data breaches or identify theft, are very common occurrences on these platforms. Some experts contend that the open nature of online dating — that is, the fact that many users are strangers to one another — has created a less civil dating environment and therefore makes it difficult to hold people accountable for their behavior.
This survey finds that a notable share of online daters have been subjected to some form of harassment measured in this survey. Fewer online daters say someone via a dating site or app has threatened to physically harm them. Younger women are particularly likely to encounter each of these behaviors.
The likelihood of encountering these kinds of behaviors on dating platforms also varies by sexual orientation. LGB users are also more likely than straight users to say someone on a dating site or app continued to contact them after they told them they were not interested, called them an offensive name or threatened to physically harm them. only minimally affected attractiveness ratings.
Researchers believe that users make up for the lack of information in online profiles by filling in the blanks with guesses based on small pieces of information. Some theorize that online daters may be wearing rose colored glasses when looking at potential dates — filling in the information gaps with positive qualities in a potential partner Gibbs et al.
In one study, knowing more information about a potential date generally led to liking them less, possibly because it called out inconsistencies and reduced opportunities to fill in the blanks with positive inferences.
But, with a particularly compatible partner, more information led to more liking. For online daters, this means that a very detailed profile might attract fewer, but more compatible suitors Norton et al.
Research has also revealed gender differences in both preference and messaging behavior on online dating sites.
In particular, women and men differ in the relative importance they assign to various attributes of potential partners. A forthcoming study conducted by Günter Hitsch, Ali Hortaçsu both at University of Chicago , and Dan Ariely Duke University confirmed existing evolutional theory, finding that in a sample of 22, online daters women weigh income more than physical attributes, including facial attractiveness, height and body mass index, when deciding who to contact Hitsch et al.
Interestingly, these differences persist even when reproduction is no longer a factor. In a nine-month study of participants on a dating site in and , Andrew Fiore, a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley, and his colleagues examined stated preferences and actual messaging behavior Fiore et al.
In general, women really are pickier than men — listing smaller ranges in their preferences for age and ethnicity. Women also initiate and reply to contact less than men. They were contacted much more than men and, hence, generally had their choice of who to reply to. More popular users are contacted more and, therefore, are less likely to respond to any one user. In a study, Fiore and Judith Donath Massachusetts Institute of Technology examined messaging data from 65, users of a United States-based dating site.
They found that users preferred sameness on all of the categories they tested a variety of features from child preferences to education to physical features like height. But some factors played a larger role than others, with marital status and wanting or already having children showing the strongest same-seeking.
Fiore has also found that women responded more frequently to men whose popularity on the site a measure based on the average number of people contacting the user per day was similar to their own Fiore, Hitsch and colleagues found that similarity was strongly preferred in a variety of factors, including age, education, height, religion, political views, and smoking.
They also found a strong same-race preference. Interestingly, women have a more pronounced same-race preference, and this preference is not always revealed in their stated preferences Hitsch, et al. Online dating service users tend to contact people who are about as attractive as they are, but does your own attractiveness level influence how attractive you believe others to be?
One research team put this question to the test on the website HOTorNOT. The site was launched in purely for users to rate each other on how attractive or, obviously, not they were. Later, the site added an online dating component. Consistent with previous research, this study, published in Psychological Science , found that people with similar levels of physical attractiveness indeed tend to date each other, with more attractive people being more particular about the physical attractiveness of their potential dates.
Compared to females, males are more influenced by how physically attractive their potential dates are, but less affected by how attractive they themselves are when deciding whom to date. But these findings about gender bias in attraction are being challenged in other studies — more on this later. Assessing potential partners online hinges on other users being truthful in their descriptions. Psychological scientists have turned to online dating to examine how truthful people are in their descriptions of themselves, both with themselves and to others.
Online daters walk a fine line — everyone wants to make themselves as attractive as possible to potential dates, making deception very tempting. Catalina Toma, Jeffrey Hancock both at Cornell University , and Nicole Ellison Michigan State University examined the relationship between actual physical attributes and online self-descriptions of online daters in New York.
They found that lying was ubiquitous, but usually fairly small in terms of magnitude. Men tended to lie about height and women tended to lie about weight. Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist and co-author of the HOTorNOT. com study and the forth-coming article with Hitsch and Hortaçsu, was initially drawn to online dating because it seemed like a very nice solution to a common problem — people in need of partners and no market for them to find each other.
Another modern dating innovation may provide a better solution: speed dating. Since then, speed dating has spread around the world, giving millions of singles a chance at love. It also gives savvy researchers an unprecedented chance to study attraction in situ. This hunch was confirmed by a speed dating outing with several other Northwestern colleagues, and the researchers embarked a new track of speed dating work. No word on whether the outing was a success from other standpoints.
As Finkel and Eastwick point out in a study published in Current Directions in Psychological Science , the popularity of speed dating allows the collection of large, real world samples across cultures, ethnicities, and socioeconomic levels. The speed dating design also lets researchers to study both sides of a dyadic process. Also, speed dating allows for exploring reciprocity effects. A Psychological Science article Eastwick et al. Speed dating empowers researchers to study interactions as they happen, rather than post-hoc reports.
It also allows for testing actual versus stated preferences. One speed dating study showed that stated preferences do not match actual preferences and called into question the gender biases in attraction that have been well-documented elsewhere i.
Speed dating studies also allow researchers to study the implications of simple changes in dating paradigms. This idea holds true at speed dating events, where women generally stay seated while the men rotate. This set-up stems from vague notions of chivalry, but also from more mundane purposes — according to one speed dating company executive, women tend to have more stuff with them, like purses, and are therefore less efficient movers.
Could this set-up in itself affect attraction? Turns out that it can. In most speed dating scenarios as in most attraction scenarios in general women are more selective.
But, when women rotated, this effect disappeared and they became less selective than the men. he search for love is never easy and attraction is never simple.
Research into online matchmaking and speed dating is providing valuable insight into the human quest for romance, and this is only the beginning. Most of the research in this area to-date focuses on dating behavior of heterosexuals in the United States. More work is necessary to determine if the findings so far also apply to international daters and to understand the dynamics of homosexual pairings. Emerging methods may also bring new insight into dating dynamics.
Finkel and Eastwick have begun using a coding scheme to study exactly what participants are saying during their dates, allowing them to potentially code what exactly makes a date great or awkward.
Is it better to communicate independence from or interdependence with your partner? Eastwick, P. Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science , 18 , — Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 94 , Finkel, E.
Arbitrary social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity. Psychological Science , 20 , Current Directions in Psychological Science , 17 , Fiore, A. Homophily in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself? Short Paper, ACM Computer-Human Interaction Online personals: An overview. Fiore, A T. Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles. Gibbs, J. Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating.
Communication Research , 33 , Hitsch, G. in press. Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review.
Read the Full Text. Many of us enter the dating pool looking for that special someone, but finding a romantic partner can be difficult. In this new report, Eli J. Finkel Northwestern University , Paul W. Karney UCLA , Harry T.
Reis University of Rochester , and Susan Sprecher Illinois State University take a comprehensive look at the access, communication, and matching services provided by online dating sites. Although the authors find that online dating sites offer a distinctly different experience than conventional dating, the superiority of these sites is not as evident.
Dating sites provide access to more potential partners than do traditional dating methods, but the act of browsing and comparing large numbers of profiles can lead individuals to commoditize potential partners and can reduce their willingness to commit to any one person.
Communicating online can foster intimacy and affection between strangers, but it can also lead to unrealistic expectations and disappointment when potential partners meet in real life. As online dating matures, however, it is likely that more and more people will avail themselves of these services, and if development — and use — of these sites is guided by rigorous psychological science, they may become a more promising way for people to meet their perfect partners.
Hear author Eli J. Finkel discuss the science behind online dating at the 24th APS Annual Convention. About the Authors. I agree wholeheartedly that so-called scientific dating sites are totally off-base. They make worse matches than just using a random site. They also have a very small pool of educated, older men, and lots more women. Therefore they often come up with no matches at all, despite the fact that women with many different personality types in that age group have joined.
They are an expensive rip-off for many women over My mother and father had very few hobbies and interests in common, but because they shared the same core values, their love endured a lifetime. I met a few potential love interests online and I never paid for any matching service!
I did my own research on people and chatted online within a site to see if we had things in common. If that went well, we would have another date. I am currently with a man I met online and we have been together for two years! We have plans to marry in the future. I myself would probably start looking right away since looking for love online is a lengthy process!
I knew this man 40 years ago as we worked in the same agency for two years but never dated. Last November I saw his profile on a dating site. My husband had died four years ago and his wife died 11 years ago. We dated for five months. I questioned him about his continued online search as I had access to his username. I think he has been on these dating sites for over 5 years.
Needless to say I will not tolerate this and it was over. No-one seems very interested in making an actual purchase or commitment. I notice that all the previous comments are from women only.
I agree with the article that says essentially, there are too many profiles and photos. And on it goes. The term Chemistry gets thrown around a lot. Stumbling upon this article during research for my Master thesis and I am curious: Would you use an app, that introduces a new way of dating, solely based on your voice and who you are, rather than how you look like? makes you laugh. And we are definitely more than our looks. I found my partner online and we had no picture of each other for three months — but we talked every night for hours….
fell in love and still are after 10 years… We met on a different level and got aligned long before we met. So, the question is, would you give this way of meeting someone a chance… an app where you can listen in to answers people give to questions other user asked before and where you can get a feeling for somebody before you even see them?
APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February , you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation.
For more information, please see our Community Guidelines. A new NIH report emphasizes the importance of behavioral science in improving health, observes that support for these sciences at NIH is unevenly distributed, and makes recommendations for how to improve their support at the agency.
APS has written to the U. Senate to encourage the integration of psychological science into a new draft bill focused on U. pandemic preparedness and response. website builder. Lynne July 1, Lisa January 24, Vickie February 4, Carol Blair August 9, Jocelyn June 23, Sandra April 25, APS Advocates for Psychological Science in New Pandemic Preparedness Bill APS has written to the U.
These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website.
These cookies do not store any personal information. Functional Functional. Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features. Performance Performance. Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors. Analytics Analytics. Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website.
These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc. Cookie Duration Description at-rand never AddThis sets this cookie to track page visits, sources of traffic and share counts. CONSENT 2 years YouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data. uvc 1 year 27 days Set by addthis. com to determine the usage of addthis.
com service. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously. Advertisement Advertisement. Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Cookie Duration Description loc 1 year 27 days AddThis sets this geolocation cookie to help understand the location of users who share the information. YSC session YSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages. yt-remote-connected-devices never YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video. yt-remote-device-id never YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
innertube::nextId never This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen. innertube::requests never This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen. Others Others.
Research Article Summary Online dating sites frequently claim that they have fundamentally altered the dating landscape for the better. This article employs psychological science to · 21 Most Fascinating Dating Studies for 1. Around 47% of Americans Say It’s Harder to Date Now. The rise of online dating has undeniably changed how single 2. Estimated Reading Time: 10 mins · A Solid 28% of Online Daters Make Over $75K a Year. In , the number crunchers at Statistica broke down the income levels of the online dating population to see if The University of Indiana presents this study, which investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants, exploring how participants manage their own online ... read more
A group of U. Also, speed dating allows for exploring reciprocity effects. This form of striking up new relationships is entirely dependent on our digital platforms or smart devices. The study extended the theoretical concept of selective self-presentation to online photographs, and discusses issues of self-deception and social desirability bias. in press. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 , YSC session YSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.YouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data. Catalina Toma, Jeffrey Hancock online dating research studies at Cornell Universityand Nicole Ellison Michigan State University examined the relationship between actual physical attributes and online self-descriptions of online daters in New York. I agree wholeheartedly that so-called scientific dating sites are totally off-base. Please let us know so we can add them to our list: [email protected] Reviews of the best dating sites in Australia: Online dating personals Matchmaking sites Adult dating sites, online dating research studies. Dating sites provide access to more potential partners than do traditional dating methods, but the act of browsing and comparing large numbers of profiles can lead individuals to commoditize potential partners and can reduce their willingness to commit to any one person.